
What Is Rogers MAGTREX 555?
Rogers MAGTREX 555 is a magneto-dielectric antenna laminate with a relative permittivity (εr) of approximately 5.5 and—critically—a relative permeability (μr) near 1.3 at UHF and low-GHz frequencies. Unlike conventional dielectric-only substrates where miniaturization depends entirely on raising εr, MAGTREX 555 uses both electric and magnetic loading to reduce the guided wavelength. The result is an antenna substrate that can cut patch dimensions by 40–60 % compared to air while maintaining usable bandwidth, because the wave impedance inside the material stays closer to that of free space.
This makes the MAGTREX 555 PCB especially relevant for GNSS, LTE, sub-6 GHz 5G, UHF RFID, and compact IoT antenna designs where board area is at a premium but bandwidth and efficiency cannot be sacrificed to a purely high-Dk approach.
Why Magneto-Dielectric Materials Matter for Antenna Substrates

A standard patch antenna resonates when its length is roughly half the guided wavelength, λg = λ0 / √(εr · μr). On a conventional laminate (μr ≈ 1), the only way to shrink λg is to increase εr. Raising εr alone, however, concentrates the electric field inside the substrate, which narrows impedance bandwidth and lowers radiation efficiency—a well-known trade-off that limits how far you can miniaturize a patch on materials like Taconic RF-60A with its Dk of 6.15.
A magneto-dielectric substrate introduces μr > 1, so the refractive index n = √(εr · μr) rises without requiring an equally high εr. The intrinsic impedance of the medium, η = η0 · √(μr / εr), stays higher than it would on a dielectric-only laminate of the same index, which improves the impedance match to free space and preserves bandwidth. MAGTREX 555 exploits this principle with engineered magnetic filler particles dispersed in a thermoset matrix.
Index of Refraction vs. Wave Impedance: The Core Trade-Off
| Parameter | Dielectric-only (εr = 6, μr = 1) | MAGTREX 555 (εr ≈ 5.5, μr ≈ 1.3) |
|---|---|---|
| Refractive index n | 2.45 | 2.67 |
| Wavelength reduction factor | ×0.41 | ×0.37 |
| Intrinsic impedance η (Ω) | 154 | 183 |
| Relative bandwidth impact | Narrower | Wider for same size |
The higher η of MAGTREX 555 means less stored reactive energy at the patch edge, translating into a wider impedance bandwidth for a given degree of miniaturization. This is the fundamental advantage that justifies the material’s higher cost over standard PTFE or hydrocarbon laminates.
MAGTREX 555 Key Electrical and Mechanical Properties
| Property | Typical Value | Test Condition / Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Dielectric constant εr | 5.5 ± 0.15 | 1 GHz, IPC-TM-650 2.5.5.5 |
| Relative permeability μr | 1.25 – 1.35 | 500 MHz – 2 GHz |
| Dielectric loss tangent tan δe | 0.004 | 1 GHz |
| Magnetic loss tangent tan δm | 0.02 – 0.04 | Frequency dependent |
| Thermal conductivity | 0.5 W/m·K | — |
| CTE (z-axis) | 35 ppm/°C | Below Tg |
| Standard thickness | 30, 60, 120 mil (0.76, 1.52, 3.05 mm) | — |
| Copper cladding | ½ oz, 1 oz ED copper | — |
Note that tan δm is significant and rises with frequency. Above roughly 2–3 GHz the magnetic losses begin to dominate total insertion loss, which is why Rogers positions MAGTREX 555 primarily for applications below 3 GHz. For higher bands, a conventional low-loss laminate such as Taconic RF-35 or Rogers RO4350B is usually more efficient.
Calculating Wavelength in MAGTREX 555
To size a patch or slot on this material, you need the guided wavelength λg = c₀ / (f · √(εr · μr)). At 1.575 GHz (GPS L1), with εr = 5.5 and μr = 1.3, λg ≈ 71.3 mm, versus 81.2 mm on a dielectric-only substrate with εr = 5.5 and μr = 1. The difference is 12 % more shrinkage for “free”—without narrowing bandwidth.
Enter your operating frequency and the effective εr · μr product below to get the guided wavelength directly:
For a GPS L1 patch on 60 mil (1.52 mm) MAGTREX 555, the calculator returns λg ≈ 71 mm, giving a resonant half-wavelength patch length of about 35.5 mm before fringing-field correction. That is compact enough to fit inside many IoT enclosures that would reject a standard FR-4 patch at the same frequency.
Impedance and Dielectric Height Considerations
Because MAGTREX 555 has both elevated εr and μr, the relationship between trace width, substrate height and characteristic impedance differs from a standard microstrip calculation. A 50 Ω feed line on 60 mil MAGTREX 555 is narrower than on a Dk-3.5 laminate of the same height, which can complicate connector transitions and soldering. Designers often use a coplanar-waveguide feed or a probe feed to avoid a very narrow microstrip.
Use the solver below to find the substrate height needed for a target impedance at your chosen trace width, or iterate width for a fixed height:
For example, targeting 50 Ω on 60 mil MAGTREX 555 with an effective Dk of about 5.5 yields a microstrip width near 1.6 mm (63 mil). That is manageable for standard PCB processes, but verify the result with a full-wave solver that accounts for μr—most simple microstrip calculators assume μr = 1 and will underestimate the required width.
Design Guidelines for MAGTREX 555 PCB Antennas

1. Account for Magnetic Loss in Efficiency Budgets
Total substrate loss includes both dielectric and magnetic components: αtotal ∝ f · (εr · tan δe + μr · tan δm). At 1 GHz, the magnetic loss contribution can be comparable to or larger than the dielectric loss. Budget 0.5–1.0 dB of additional substrate loss versus a low-loss PTFE laminate, and confirm with a driven full-wave simulation that includes complex permeability.
2. Use Full-Wave Solvers That Support μr
HFSS, CST Microwave Studio and FEKO all allow you to assign both εr and μr (with loss tangents) to a substrate layer. Transmission-line calculators that ignore μr will give incorrect impedance, resonant frequency and bandwidth estimates. Altium’s impedance tools, for instance, currently assume μr = 1, so treat their outputs as starting points only.
3. Ground Plane and Via Considerations
The magnetic filler in MAGTREX 555 is particulate and non-conductive, so standard drilling and plating processes work, but the material is harder on drill bits than PTFE. Use carbide drills with a maximum hit count roughly 30 % lower than for RO4350B, and confirm hole-wall quality with cross-sectioning on first articles. Via fencing around the antenna perimeter is recommended to suppress surface-wave modes, which are stronger in high-index substrates.
4. Hybrid Stackups
A common architecture pairs a MAGTREX 555 antenna layer with a standard RF laminate for the feed network and active circuitry. For example, a 60 mil MAGTREX 555 top layer bonded to a 10–20 mil RO4350B feed layer using a Rogers CuClad or RO4450F prepreg. This isolates the magneto-dielectric benefits to the radiating element while keeping transmission-line losses low in the feed. Designers exploring additive or inkjet-printed feed structures may also consider Rogers Radix printable dielectric for embedded matching networks.
Fabrication Notes
- Lamination: MAGTREX 555 is a thermoset system. Follow Rogers’ recommended press cycle (typically 350 °F / 177 °C, 200–300 psi, 60–90 min). Over-pressing can crack magnetic filler particles and shift μr.
- Routing: Use diamond-coated router bits. The magnetic filler is abrasive; standard carbide bits wear quickly and leave rough edges that can affect antenna pattern symmetry.
- Copper adhesion: Standard oxide or oxide-alternative treatments work. Peel strength is comparable to RO4000-series laminates (≥ 6 lb/in for 1 oz copper).
- Surface finish: ENIG, immersion tin and OSP are all compatible. For probe-fed patches, ENIG is preferred for consistent solder joint quality at the feed pin.
- Panel size: Currently available in panels up to 18 × 12 inches (457 × 305 mm). Confirm availability with the Rogers MAGTREX product page before committing to large-array designs.
When to Choose MAGTREX 555 vs. Alternatives
| Scenario | Best Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum miniaturization below 2 GHz, bandwidth matters | MAGTREX 555 | Magneto-dielectric loading preserves BW |
| Miniaturization below 2 GHz, cost sensitive | Taconic RF-41 (Dk 4.10) | Lower Dk still shrinks patch; no magnetic loss |
| Above 3 GHz, low insertion loss critical | RO4350B or PTFE (e.g., RO3003) | Magnetic losses in MAGTREX 555 too high |
| Large-scale RFID tag production | FR-4 or low-cost hydrocarbon | Cost per unit dominates; MAGTREX 555 is overkill |
| Conformal or 3D antenna on curved surface | Thin MAGTREX 555 (30 mil) | Thermoset matrix can be thermoformed to moderate radii |
Frequently Asked Questions
Can MAGTREX 555 be used above 3 GHz?
Physically yes, but magnetic losses (tan δm) rise with frequency and typically exceed 0.05 above 3 GHz, reducing antenna efficiency significantly. For bands above 3 GHz, a conventional low-Df laminate is usually a better choice.
Does MAGTREX 555 require special PCB fabrication equipment?
No exotic equipment is needed, but the magnetic filler is abrasive. Diamond-coated routing bits and reduced drill hit counts are recommended. Standard lamination presses, plating lines and surface-finish processes are compatible.
How does MAGTREX 555 compare to high-Dk ceramics for antenna miniaturization?
Ceramic-loaded substrates (Dk 9–20) achieve more absolute size reduction, but with severely narrowed bandwidth (often < 1 %). MAGTREX 555 offers moderate miniaturization with 3–5× wider bandwidth, making it better suited for wideband or multi-band antennas.
Is MAGTREX 555 RoHS compliant?
Yes. Rogers certifies MAGTREX 555 as RoHS compliant and lead-free assembly compatible with reflow profiles up to 260 °C peak.
What is the typical lead time for MAGTREX 555 laminates?
Lead times vary by thickness and copper weight but generally run 6–10 weeks from Rogers distribution. Prototyping quantities from stocking distributors may ship faster; confirm before committing to a project schedule.
Ready for a quotation?
Send your requirements for a material, stackup and manufacturing review. Price and schedule are confirmed for your project.
